Need support for has_many through with has_one in the “bridge table”

Let me expose the problem with an example :

Cart model (as in : shopping cart)

Bill model

User

Basically, because the “through” table links the destination table with a has_one relationship, ActiveRecord complains with : Invalid source reflection macro :has_one for has_many :bills, :through => :carts. Use :source to specify the source reflection.

Someone on Rails Trac already created a ticket about this issue 2 years ago. Can we expect this feature to be officially supported in the future? Let’s hope so.

acts_as_state_machine and variable initial states

acts_as_state_machine is a great plugin really useful when you want to add constraints and behavior to your model objects.

Note : Those who don’t know what this plugin is all about should stop reading right there or risk being completely lost.

One thing that seems impossible to do with the plugin is to have variable “initial states” for an object. Say for example that you have a User model that needs to act as a state machine. New users have to fill up a signup form to gain access to the application. These new users will be “pending” until an administrator approve them (enabled) or refuse them (disabled)

So far so good. But what if an administrator can also create a new user? In this case we would’nt want the user to be “pending”, we want him to be “enabled” right away.

I experimented a similar scenario, so I tried a few things to bypass the initial state :

Too bad, so I tried this :

Of course, the following worked :

Yuk… there had to be something better.

Finally, I learned that initial_state was an inheritable attribute. I didn’t know what those were all about so I did some googling. The only good explanation I found is this one.

Anyway, I was able to override the initial state of my user object by doing this :

It’s not pretty I know, but at least it gets the job done. I wonder if the fact that you cannot “easily” change the initial state programmatically is a missing feature that should be added in a future version… or if it’s only my understanding of a “state machine” that sucks. Any thoughts?