Comments on: Ruby and C : Part 1 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/ Because programming should be fun Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:48:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Pointer http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-891 Pointer Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:35:24 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-891 <strong>Pointer...</strong> Your topic Ruby Fleebie " Ruby and C : Part 1 was useful.... Pointer…

Your topic Ruby Fleebie ” Ruby and C : Part 1 was useful….

]]> By: Frank http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-890 Frank Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:33:23 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-890 Mike, haha :) Never again will I put "Part 1" in a post title... I really intended to follow through with the second part but I never had the time. I swear one day it will come out... and hopefully people will still find it useful. Mike, haha :) Never again will I put “Part 1″ in a post title…

I really intended to follow through with the second part but I never had the time. I swear one day it will come out… and hopefully people will still find it useful.

]]> By: Jason Watkins http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-889 Jason Watkins Tue, 05 Jan 2010 06:25:48 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-889 FFI is definitely the way to go for adapting a library. FFI is definitely the way to go for adapting a library.

]]> By: Mike http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-885 Mike Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:07:07 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-885 Insightful. Can has part 2 now? plzkthx ;D Insightful.
Can has part 2 now? plzkthx ;D

]]> By: sim http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-863 sim Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:12:22 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-863 Great look in depth ! Great look in depth !

]]> By: ActsAsFlinn http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-832 ActsAsFlinn Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:39:17 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-832 Nice intro, waiting for the second part. Is ffi still experimental or slower than writing a c ext? Nice intro, waiting for the second part. Is ffi still experimental or slower than writing a c ext?

]]> By: Super Goo http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-830 Super Goo Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:19:00 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-830 In addition to ffi, there's also Ruby/DL: ttsky.net/ruby/ruby-dl.html In addition to ffi, there’s also Ruby/DL: ttsky.net/ruby/ruby-dl.html

]]> By: Frank http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-828 Frank Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:29:16 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-828 I don't know much of this extension. Why don't you write a post about it instead? I don’t know much of this extension. Why don’t you write a post about it instead?

]]> By: Chris Burke http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-827 Chris Burke Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:14:23 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-827 Why not use ffi? or at least mention it. Why not use ffi? or at least mention it.

]]> By: Noam B http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-823 Noam B Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:04:19 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/ruby-and-c-part-1/#comment-823 I learned a lot, thanks! I learned a lot, thanks!

]]>