<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life beyond the each iterator</title>
	<link>http://www.rubyfleebie.com/life-beyond-the-each-iterator/</link>
	<description>Because programming should be fun</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Redden</title>
		<link>http://www.rubyfleebie.com/life-beyond-the-each-iterator/#comment-543</link>
		<author>Taylor Redden</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rubyfleebie.com/life-beyond-the-each-iterator/#comment-543</guid>
					<description>great article.

I personally have come to love my new shoes, uniq! for those that don't know, if removes all the duplicates in the array. took me awhile to find that one. I mean, i knew ruby could do it, I just couldn't find out what it was named...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article.</p>
<p>I personally have come to love my new shoes, uniq! for those that don&#8217;t know, if removes all the duplicates in the array. took me awhile to find that one. I mean, i knew ruby could do it, I just couldn&#8217;t find out what it was named&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.rubyfleebie.com/life-beyond-the-each-iterator/#comment-544</link>
		<author>Frank</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rubyfleebie.com/life-beyond-the-each-iterator/#comment-544</guid>
					<description>@Taylor,

This is a really handy method indeed! Thanks for mentioning it... I was not aware of its existence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Taylor,</p>
<p>This is a really handy method indeed! Thanks for mentioning it&#8230; I was not aware of its existence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.rubyfleebie.com/life-beyond-the-each-iterator/#comment-545</link>
		<author>Dan</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rubyfleebie.com/life-beyond-the-each-iterator/#comment-545</guid>
					<description>Because each is like the first thing we learn when we begin Ruby, we think that it's the only one of its kind. I feel ashamed to learn these new functions after almost a year of developing in Ruby...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because each is like the first thing we learn when we begin Ruby, we think that it&#8217;s the only one of its kind. I feel ashamed to learn these new functions after almost a year of developing in Ruby&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Hutchins</title>
		<link>http://www.rubyfleebie.com/life-beyond-the-each-iterator/#comment-546</link>
		<author>Grant Hutchins</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rubyfleebie.com/life-beyond-the-each-iterator/#comment-546</guid>
					<description>Another important point to consider is that the other iterators will most likely outperform the implementations that use each. The iterators in the base classes are implemented directly in C for the most part, and thus should eliminate a lot of the overhead and garbage collection that slow down using pure Ruby solutions based on each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another important point to consider is that the other iterators will most likely outperform the implementations that use each. The iterators in the base classes are implemented directly in C for the most part, and thus should eliminate a lot of the overhead and garbage collection that slow down using pure Ruby solutions based on each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
