Comments on: Diving into ruby object model : Part 1 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/diving-into-ruby-object-model-part-1/ Because programming should be fun Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:23:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2 By: Kris http://www.rubyfleebie.com/diving-into-ruby-object-model-part-1/#comment-213 Kris Thu, 17 May 2007 10:31:50 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/diving-into-ruby-object-model-part-1/#comment-213 Instead of: def MyClass.my_class_method I think you can also use: def self.my_class_method Instead of:

def MyClass.my_class_method

I think you can also use:

def self.my_class_method

]]> By: Jamal http://www.rubyfleebie.com/diving-into-ruby-object-model-part-1/#comment-216 Jamal Fri, 18 May 2007 11:35:48 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/diving-into-ruby-object-model-part-1/#comment-216 Yes he could, but it's just a taste :) Yes he could, but it’s just a taste :)

]]> By: Kris http://www.rubyfleebie.com/diving-into-ruby-object-model-part-1/#comment-217 Kris Fri, 18 May 2007 12:30:23 +0000 http://www.rubyfleebie.com/diving-into-ruby-object-model-part-1/#comment-217 Agreed. Actually there is another article on this site saying the exact same thing - I didn't see it prior to posting! I personally prefer self because I think it is more explanatory of what it is plus if you ever change the class name then you don't need to do a find/replace. Agreed. Actually there is another article on this site saying the exact same thing - I didn’t see it prior to posting! I personally prefer self because I think it is more explanatory of what it is plus if you ever change the class name then you don’t need to do a find/replace.

]]>